"What for? So you can harrass them? No thanks. You're not forthcoming with whom you are, what religious platform you adhere to, or where you attend church, so you don't get to discover that of mine."
I have been telling you my Christian beliefs and doctrines for years!
Even more so the last couple of days.
Who are you trying to deceive?
I marvel at your brazen efforts to deceive.
"Can you name for me even one, just one Christian church that would have you for a member, if you were to state to the congregation what you have said to me so far about these words above?"
What for? So you can harrass them? No thanks. You're not forthcoming with whom you are, what religious platform you adhere to, or where you attend church, so you don't get to discover that of mine.
I didn't ask for the name of the church that you say you attend.
Jesus was God incarnate.
The Bible teaches that as I explained to you.
You reject the word of God as usual.
"The Bible does not teach that any man is the "author" of Scripture as you stated."
For the love of God, you're not that flipping ignorant, are you? You know damn and well that every one of the Apostles were mortal men. They were not dieties.
The end result is that holy men of God per Scripture wrote what God wanted them to write.
You don't believe that is possible?
You don't believe that the God of heaven and earth could not move men to write his revelation to mankind?
It is very evident that you are the ignorant one.
"You use the words Son of God but you have a different meaning for those words than what Christians have for the words Son of God."
Sir, there are many Christians who agree with my stance that God was not Jesus and visa/versa.
You can't even name one.
Who do you think you are fooling with Uh huh... and No I don't, You do.
You don't dare name a Church or a well known commentator or Minister who agrees with you.
I could find some, maybe scores of Christian churches on the web that give "what we believe" positions stating what I have stated contrary to your heresies.
One has to believe the doctrines of Christianity to be a Christian.
This is simply fundamentally true.
You use words of Christianity but you have different meanings for them.
You use the words Jesus Christ but you mean things different than what Christians mean for the words Jesus Christ.
You use the word Bible but you have a different meaning for the word than what Christians have for the word Bible.
You use the words Son of God but you have a different meaning for those words than what Christians have for the words Son of God.
Can you name for me even one, just one Christian church that would have you for a member, if you were to state to the congregation what you have said to me so far about these words above?
Conservative wrote: "You deny that most of the Gospel of John is the word of God and is just his opinion and consequently is not binding, in fact he has to be a liar according to your thinking."
The Bible is a collection of letters, written by approximately 40 authors. You're not going to convince me that God or his Son dictated every single word. Of course they are filled with opinions.
"Dictation" is not the doctrine taught in the Bible as to the author of Scripture:
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 2 Timothy 3:16
That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. 2 Timothy 3:17
The Bible does not teach that any man is the "author" of Scripture as you stated.
"So, why do you accept John 3:16 as the words of Jesus when John wrote those words?"
Because they are quotes. I trust quotes. I do not trust opinions and assertions
But you don't trust John who said they were the words of Jesus Christ.
In your opinion he is a liar, so how can you pick and chose when he is lying and when he is telling the truth?
The translators put the words of Jesus in quotes and you don't trust them either.